FEATURES OF THE JUDICIAL PROCEDURAL SYSTEM IN NUCLEAR ENERGY

Authors

  • Timur Anvarovich Ibadullaev Independent Researcher, University of World Economy and Diplomacy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61796/ejcblt.v1i10.1032

Keywords:

nuclear evergy, judicial procedural system, civil lability, nuclear demage, vienna convention

Abstract

The article is dedicated to studying the judicial and procedural features related to nuclear energy regulation and dispute resolution within this sector. Given the high risks associated with the operation of nuclear facilities, judicial systems must consider both national legal norms and international agreements, such as the 1963 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage. This work analyzes the legal mechanisms of civil liability for nuclear damage and compensation procedures using examples from the United States, France, Russia, and China. Special attention is paid to the involvement of experts, procedural norms, insurance issues for nuclear operators, and appeal mechanisms. Additionally, challenges in ensuring the independence of judges in cases related to nuclear incidents and the role of international cooperation in creating unified standards for nuclear safety are explored.

References

Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act, 1957.

Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 21 May 1963. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc500.pdf

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, United States of America. [Online]. Available: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-1630/pdf/COMPS-1630.pdf

Law on Transparency and Security in the Nuclear Field, No. 2006-686, France, 13 June 2006. [Online]. Available: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000819043

The Nuclear Safety Authority (L'Autorité de sûreté nucléaire, ASN), France. [Online]. Available: https://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr/

Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy, 29 July 1960; and Joint Protocol Relating to the Application of the Vienna and Paris Conventions, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 21 May 1963. [Online]. Available: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20956/volume-956-i-13706-english.pdf and https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc402.pdf

Federal Law "On the Use of Atomic Energy" No. 170-FZ and Federal Law "On Radiation Safety of the Population" No. 3-FZ, Russian Federation. [Online]. Available: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_8450/ and https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_8797/

Nuclear Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.caea.gov.cn/english/n6759372/c6812918/content.html and https://www.caea.gov.cn/english/n6759372/c6812925/content.html

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, United States of America, p.170. [Online]. Available: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-1630/pdf/COMPS-1630.pdf

Report of the UN Secretary-General, Seventy-seventh Session of the UN General Assembly, 19 October 2022. [Online]. Available: https://documents.un.org/symbol-explorer?s=A/77/537&i=A/77/537_1258724

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Anvarovich Ibadullaev, T. (2024). FEATURES OF THE JUDICIAL PROCEDURAL SYSTEM IN NUCLEAR ENERGY. Journal of Contemporary Business Law & Technology: Cyber Law, Blockchain, and Legal Innovations, 1(10), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.61796/ejcblt.v1i10.1032