Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to examine the theoretical foundations and methodologies of the Country Risk Assessment Model (CRAM), focusing on its ability to evaluate country risk through a comprehensive analysis of economic, political, and social indicators. Method: CRAM employs a weighted scoring system, integrating indicators from economic, political, and social domains to construct an aggregate risk score. Data sources include the IMF, World Bank, PRS Group, Transparency International, and the UNDP. Weights for each indicator are derived through regression analysis, expert surveys, and historical correlations with adverse events. Results: The model’s composite index provides a nuanced and multi-dimensional risk assessment, offering valuable insights for investment decisions and forecasting. However, CRAM’s reliance on historical data may limit its responsiveness to rapidly changing risk factors such as political upheavals or sanctions. Novelty: This study highlights the potential for enhancing CRAM by incorporating machine learning techniques to dynamically adjust indicator weights, as well as integrating sub-national data for more precise assessments in large, diverse countries. These improvements could enhance CRAM's predictive accuracy and maintain its relevance in an evolving global risk landscape.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- Daniel Wagner, dalam Managing Country Risk, Productivity Press, 2012, hlm. 107–128. doi: 10.1201/b11601-13.
- Ü. KURT, “THE LINK BETWEEN POLITICAL STABILITY AND GDP GROWTH RATE: A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS FOR MENAT COUNTRIES,” Social Sciences Studies Journal, vol. 4, no. 24, hlm. 5081–5086, Jan 2018, doi: 10.26449/sssj.972.
- M. A. Ramady, “Errata to: Political, Economic and Financial Country Risk,” dalam Political, Economic and Financial Country Risk, Springer International Publishing, 2014, hlm. E1–E2. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02177-5_16.
- P. Keat, “What markets miss: political stability frameworks and country risk,” dalam Managing Strategic Surprise, Cambridge University Press, 2008, hlm. 265–286. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511755880.008.
- S. V. Ukraintseva dan A. I. Yashin, Economic progress as cancer risk factor. II: Why is overall cancer risk higher in more developed countries? Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, 2005. doi: 10.4054/mpidr-wp-2005-022.
References
Daniel Wagner, dalam Managing Country Risk, Productivity Press, 2012, hlm. 107–128. doi: 10.1201/b11601-13.
Ü. KURT, “THE LINK BETWEEN POLITICAL STABILITY AND GDP GROWTH RATE: A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS FOR MENAT COUNTRIES,” Social Sciences Studies Journal, vol. 4, no. 24, hlm. 5081–5086, Jan 2018, doi: 10.26449/sssj.972.
M. A. Ramady, “Errata to: Political, Economic and Financial Country Risk,” dalam Political, Economic and Financial Country Risk, Springer International Publishing, 2014, hlm. E1–E2. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02177-5_16.
P. Keat, “What markets miss: political stability frameworks and country risk,” dalam Managing Strategic Surprise, Cambridge University Press, 2008, hlm. 265–286. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511755880.008.
S. V. Ukraintseva dan A. I. Yashin, Economic progress as cancer risk factor. II: Why is overall cancer risk higher in more developed countries? Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, 2005. doi: 10.4054/mpidr-wp-2005-022.