INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY AS A FACTOR OF INCREASING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Ergashev Akmaljon

doi:10.61796/jaide.v1i11.1129

Authors

Ergashev Akmaljon
Akmaljon@gmail.com
Andijan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnology, Uzbekistan

Vol. 1 No. 11 (2024): Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy

Articles

December 5, 2024

Downloads

View Article

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

Objective: This study explores the role of innovative activity as a critical driver of economic development, focusing on the integration of global scientific achievements and innovations to foster growth in various sectors, particularly startups. Method: A comprehensive analysis of contemporary innovation practices was conducted, combining theoretical reviews and case studies of successful international examples. The study also examines the intersection of creativity and technological advancements as foundational elements of innovation. Results: The findings demonstrate that innovation significantly contributes to economic stability and growth by enhancing productivity, promoting entrepreneurial ventures, and fostering sustainable development. Startups, in particular, benefit from a structured approach to adopting innovative practices, leading to societal and economic advancements. The study highlights the importance of integrating foreign experiences and adapting them to local contexts for optimal outcomes. Novelty: This research offers a fresh perspective on the centrality of artistic creativity as a foundation for innovation and emphasizes the strategic importance of startups in the innovation ecosystem. It bridges the gap between global practices and local implementation, providing actionable insights for policymakers and entrepreneurs aiming to enhance economic resilience through innovation.

T. Russell, “‘When the Work’s All Done This Fall,’” Rural Rhythm, hlm. 19–20, Mar 2021, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190091187.003.0005.

D. Narożna dan J. Adamska, “New concept for strong communication mechanisms within innovation ecosystems,” Innov. Ecosyst. Role Commun., hlm. 120–144, Agu 2024, doi: 10.4324/9781032697802-5.

“Technical Evaluation and Economic Benefits of A Motorized Hydraulic Presser,” J. Environ. Sci. Comput. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 12, no. 2, Jun 2023, doi: 10.24214/jecet.c.12.2.20421.

N. Khosroeva dan J. Blieva, “Algorithm of Production Relations as a Socio-Economic Form of Development of the Productive Forces of the New Technological Order,” Smart Innov. Syst. Technol., hlm. 529–535, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-18553-4_64.

A. B. Markman, “The Process of Open Innovation,” Open Innov., hlm. 1–12, Jul 2016, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199374441.003.0001.

N. Kyrylko, “DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN UKRAINE IN TODAY’S CONDITIONS,” Innov. Educ. Technol. Eur. Exp. Its Appl. Train. Econ. Manag., 2024, doi: 10.30525/978-9934-26-452-8-22.

T. Ivanenko, V. Hrushko, dan A. Frantsuz, “Optimal investment decision making on the model of production enterprise with limited resources,” Invest. Manag. Financ. Innov., vol. 15, no. 4, hlm. 61–68, Okt 2018, doi: 10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.05.

K.-T. Huang dan M. Ozer, “A multi-criteria expert decision system for investment decisions: The case of commercial real estate investments in China,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 71, hlm. 100769, Sep 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2019.100769.

E. T. Pereira, “Are the Most Competitive Countries the Most Innovative Ones?,” Impact Assess. Tour. Econ., hlm. 97–111, 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14920-2_7.

S. I. Nigmatullin, “Designed Innovative and Investment Development of the Region in the Conditions of Digital Economy to Ensure Economic Security,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Innov., hlm. 505–509, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-29364-1_99.