ADVANTAGES OF LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGES BY INTERACTIVE METHODS IN CLASSES
Downloads
Objective: This paper aims to examine the advantages of using interactive methods in foreign language learning, particularly English, and their effectiveness in comparison to traditional teaching approaches. Method: A qualitative analysis was conducted to explore the impact of interactive teaching methods on language acquisition, including case studies and examples of practical application in the classroom. The study involved observations of language instructors and feedback from students engaged in interactive learning activities. Results: The findings demonstrate that interactive methods enhance students' engagement, accelerate language learning, and promote retention of knowledge. Students showed greater enthusiasm and improved performance when involved in interactive, learner-centered activities. Moreover, teachers reported greater satisfaction in observing the active participation and creativity of their students. Novelty: The study introduces a critical perspective on the transition from traditional teaching methods to more innovative, interactive approaches. It highlights the positive effects of these methods not only on language acquisition but also on fostering a more dynamic and engaging learning environment, suggesting that interactive learning is essential for the future of foreign language education.
H. L. Hallman, “Learning to Teach English Language Learners Through English Language Arts Methods: Findings from a National Survey,” in Teaching English Language Arts to English Language Learners, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016, pp. 61–78. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-59858-5_4.
M. O’Rourke, “Repeat the Important Words Until You Understand Them: Metaphor, Memory and Meaning in Anne Carson’s Essaying,” Life Writing, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 455–472, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/14484528.2022.2093446.
S. Santhiya, “New Creative Methods in English Language Teaching for South Indian Students,” in Cultural Context and English Language Teaching in India, Iterative International Publishers, Selfypage Developers Pvt Ltd, 2024, pp. 88–93. doi: 10.58532/nbennurccch13.
L. M. Kalyanova, “Active and Interactive Methods of Teaching a Foreign Language to Students of a Technical University,” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, vol. 12, no. SP4, pp. 833–839, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.5373/jardcs/v12sp4/20201553.
M. Shoukat, H. A. Saqib, F. N. Tahir, S. I. Chema, Z. H. Qureshi, and B. Farooq, “Comparing the Student Learning Outcomes and Teaching Satisfaction of Conventional Lecture and Team-Based Learning Methods: Student Learning Outcomes and Teaching Satisfaction,” Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, pp. 91–95, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.1935.
S. Lassonde, “What a Fellowship Committee Wants to Know about Your Student: Helping Your Students Understand How to Present Themselves,” in Helping Your Students Write Personal Statements, Routledge, 2024, pp. 58–67. doi: 10.4324/9781003455387-4.
N. A. Spassiani, M. Clince, and N. Ó Murchadha, “‘It will make more people feel included if they can talk to them in their first language’: The experience of university students with an intellectual disability engaging in a formal Irish Sign Language Course,” Br J Learn Disabil, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 467–474, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1111/bld.12417.
J. Van der Veer, “How Community Can Help Solitary Creatives Finish,” in The Coach’s Guide to Completing Creative Work, Routledge, 2023, pp. 68–73. doi: 10.4324/9781003351344-13.
A. M. “Woody” Schwitzer and M. H. “Molly” Duggan, “The Beginning, Middle, and End Stages of Evaluation and Assessment: Resources for the Entire Process,” About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 21–26, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1002/abc.261.
G. Conti-Ramsden and S. Friel-Patti, “Situational Variability in Mother-Child Conversations,” in Children’s Language, Psychology Press, 2021, pp. 43–63. doi: 10.4324/9781315792668-3.
J. Hall and T. Vierkant, “Can a robot with artificial intelligence have free will?,” in Free Will, Oxford University Press, 2022, pp. 86–92. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197572153.003.0011.
D. Zielinski, “Can Playing Games Help Students Master Concepts from General Psychology Classes?,” International Journal of Game-Based Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 55–72, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.4018/ijgbl.2019040104.
T. McMahon, “Despite Our Best Intention: Students Relate How Social Promotion Hurt Them and What Changes They Believe will Help Them,” Interchange, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 499–519, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10780-018-9344-3.
L. Corbin, “Which Instructional Techniques do Students Like? Ask Them: (537802014-001),” 2014, American Psychological Association (APA). doi: 10.1037/e537802014-001.
R. Torbay, “We Don’t Have To Accept Our ‘New Normal’: From The Publisher ‘We Don’t Have To Accept Our “New Normal,”’” Health Aff, vol. 40, no. 12, p. 1984, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01641.
Copyright (c) 2025 Davronova Fotima Pirnazarovna, Bakhtiyorov Mekhruzkhon Bakhtiyorvich, Karimov Muhammadrizo Safarovich, Khabibullayev Khojiakbar Tokhirovich, Nasriyeva Gulmira Abdulloyevna, Bagirova Gulmira Akramovna, Jalilova Zaynab Isroilovna, Imomova Gulzifa Azimovna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
