ASSESSING STUDENT PROGRESS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING
Downloads
Objective: This study evaluates English language competency through various assessment procedures, highlighting both their benefits and challenges. The research focuses on established assessment methods to determine their effectiveness in monitoring student progress and modifying instructional approaches. Methods: The study explores formative and summative assessment methods to understand language proficiency across different student groups. Formative assessments include classroom observations, interactive discussions, quizzes, and mini-tests, providing immediate feedback. Summative assessments, conducted at the end of a learning period, involve final examinations and large-scale projects to evaluate overall achievement. Results: The findings indicate that formative assessments enable teachers to identify student learning gaps and develop tailored instructional strategies. Summative assessments provide a comprehensive measure of student performance. Additionally, alternative assessment methods, such as portfolios, peer reviews, and self-assessment tools, enhance student engagement and reflective learning. Novelty: This study introduces alternative assessment methods beyond traditional approaches, emphasizing their role in fostering student participation and transforming learners into active stakeholders in their language acquisition. The integration of diverse assessment techniques contributes to a more dynamic and student-centered educational framework.
P. Black and D. Wiliam, "Assessment and classroom learning," Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1998.
D. Nicol and D. Macfarlane-Dick, "Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice," Studies in Higher Education.
H. D. Brown and P. Abeywickrama, Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices, 3rd ed., Pearson Education, 2018.
R. M. Shermis and J. Burstein, Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
M. Warschauer and D. Grimes, "Automated writing assessment in the classroom," Pedagogies: An International Journal, pp. 22-36, 2008.
D. Liakin, F. Cardoso, and P. Liakina, "The effectiveness of text-to-speech software in improving L2 pronunciation," Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 1-21, 2017.
N. Akhmedova, "Challenges of AI-driven speech recognition in assessing pronunciation skills," Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, pp. 235-249, 2019.
"Duolingo: Language Learning App," Duolingo, 2024.
N. I. Akhmedova, "The Concept of Formal and Informal Conversation," International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology, 2023.
N. Barley and I. Mikhailova, "Real-Time Formative Assessment in Online Language Classroom," 2020.
J. S. Torres, "Peer-Assisted Learning in ESL Writing Classrooms: A Comparative Study," Journal of Language and Education, 2019.
S. Koltovskaia, "Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study," Assessing Writing, vol. 44, 2020, p. 100450.
A. R. S. Tambunan, W. Andayani, W. S. Sari, and F. K. Lubis, "Investigating EFL students' linguistic problems using Grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback," 2020.
U. Dewi, "Grammarly as automated writing evaluation: Its effectiveness from EFL students' perceptions," Lingua Cultura, vol. 16, no. 2, 2022, pp. 155-161.
B. Khoshnevisan, "The affordances and constraints of automatic writing evaluation (AWE) tools: A case for Grammarly," ARTESOL EFL Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, 2019, pp. 12-25.
Copyright (c) 2025 Khasanova Iroda Sobirjonovna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














