EFFECTIVITY OF SUPERVISION THEORY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATION
Downloads
This study aims to explore the factors that influence the effectiveness of supervision in education, focusing on various theories of supervision such as clinical, formal, reflective, and transformational supervision. Using a qualitative research design with a case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis in several schools. Thematic analysis was used to identify the main themes from the data obtained. The results of the study indicate that the effectiveness of supervision is influenced by the quality of communication between supervisors and teachers, a clear understanding of the purpose of supervision, and the competence of supervisors in providing constructive feedback. A supportive school context and culture are also very important for teacher professional development. A supervision approach that is tailored to the specific needs of schools and teachers has been shown to be effective in improving the quality of teaching and student learning outcomes. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of a holistic approach to supervision to achieve overall improvements in the quality of education. Recommendations for further research include longitudinal studies and exploration of the use of technology in supervision to support further teacher professional development.
Bahdin Nur Tanjung, “Education Supervision in Increasing Competence Teachers in Curriculum 2013 (Study of Education Management Analysis),” Britain Int. Linguist. Arts Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 560–566, 2020, doi: 10.33258/biolae.v2i2.267.
J. Mantik, I. Dani Nugraha, E. Vovo Sembiring, and F. Rizal, “Effectiveness of Implementing Academic Supervision in Improving Teacher Performance in Smk Negeri 5 Padang,” J. Mantik, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1393–1396, 2021.
W. L. Bedwell, S. M. Fiore, and E. Salas, “Developing the future workforce: An approach for integrating interpersonal skills into the MBA classroom,” Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 171–186, 2014, doi: 10.5465/amle.2011.0138.
F. Xie and A. Derakhshan, “A Conceptual Review of Positive Teacher Interpersonal Communication Behaviors in the Instructional Context,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, no. July, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490.
S. J. Zepeda, Instructional supervision applying tool and concepts. 2013.
J. L. Brown, S. M. Jones, M. D. LaRusso, and J. L. Aber, “Improving Classroom Quality: Teacher Influences and Experimental Impacts of the 4Rs Program,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 153–167, 2010, doi: 10.1037/a0018160.
O. Rokhman et al., “No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title,” J. Berk. Epidemiol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–96, 2020.
M. M. Kennedy, “How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching?,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 945–980, 2016, doi: 10.3102/0034654315626800.
E. Coleman et al., “Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8,” Int. J. Transgender Heal., vol. 23, no. S1, pp. S1–S259, 2022, doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644.
Susilawati, S. Trisnamansyah, S. Sauri, and C. Saodih, “Implementation Of Principal Transformational Leadership In Improving Teacher Performance In State Junior High Schools,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Soc. Sci., pp. 1689–1695, 2022.
M. Kebritchi, A. Lipschuetz, and L. Santiague, “Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 4–29, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0047239516661713.
J. N. Hook, C. E. Watkins, D. E. Davis, J. Owen, D. R. Van Tongeren, and M. J. Ramos, “Cultural humility in psychotherapy supervision,” Am. J. Psychother., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 149–166, 2016, doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2016.70.2.149.
dan G. M. Hammond LD, Hyle EM, “Effective Teacher Professional Development (research brief),” Eff. Teach. Prof. Dev. (research brief), no. June, pp. 1–8, 2017.
Maralih, “Peranan supervisi dalam peningkatan kualitas pendidikan,” J. Qathruna, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 182, 2014.
P. Rahabav, “The Effectiveness of Academic Supervision for Teacher,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 47–55, 2016.
Renata, D. Wardiah, and M. Kristiawan, “The influence of headmaster’s supervision and achievement motivation on effective teachers,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 44–49, 2018.
H. Fitria, “The influence of organizational culture and trust through the teacher performance in the private secondary school in Palembang,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 82–86, 2018.
J. M. Kuijpers, A. A. M. Houtveen, and T. Wubbels, “An integrated professional development model for effective teaching,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1687–1694, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.021.
G. S. Avortri, J. B. Nabukalu, and J. Nabyonga-Orem, “Supportive supervision to improve service delivery in low-income countries: is there a conceptual problem or a strategy problem?,” BMJ Glob. Heal., vol. 4, no. Suppl 9, p. e001151, 2019, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001151.
M. K. Alam, “A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation,” Qual. Res. Organ. Manag. An Int. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 2021, doi: 10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825.
A. Moser and I. Korstjens, “Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis,” Eur. J. Gen. Pract., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2018, doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091.
R. Rutakumwa et al., “Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis,” Qual. Res., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 565–581, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1468794119884806.
T. Šula, “Thematic analysis,” Ambient media Advert. importance Des. Ambient media Creat., pp. 66–78, 2018, doi: 10.7441/978-80-7454-682-2_4.
K. A. R. Richards and M. A. Hemphill, “A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis,” J. Teach. Phys. Educ., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 225–231, 2018, doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084.
M. Williams and T. Moser, “The Art of Coding and Thematic Exploration in Qualitative Research,” Int. Manag. Rev., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2019.
“Journal of Clinical Nursing - 2022 - Edgar - Clinical supervision A mechanism to support person‐centred practice An.pdf.”
F. L. Calvert, T. P. Crowe, and B. F. S. Grenyer, “Dialogical reflexivity in supervision: An experiential learning process for enhancing reflective and relational competencies,” Clin. Superv., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2016, doi: 10.1080/07325223.2015.1135840.
Budiyono, B. Lian, and H. Fitria, “The Influence of Principal Supervision and Organizational Climate toward Teacher’s Performance,” Electron. Res. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 172–187, 2020.
L. Lorensius, N. Anggal, and S. Lugan, “Academic Supervision in the Improvement of Teachers’ Professional Competencies: Effective Practices on the Emergence,” EduLine J. Educ. Learn. Innov., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–107, 2022, doi: 10.35877/454ri.eduline805.
N. Özdemir, “How to improve teachers’ instructional practices: the role of professional learning activities, classroom observation and leadership content knowledge in Turkey,” J. Educ. Adm., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 585–603, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JEA-10-2019-0189.
J. Siti Katijah, “Mirrors for an esl classroom : using reflective teaching to explore classroom practice and enhance professional growth,” English Teach., vol. XXXV, pp. 99–116, 2006.
L. Miller, “Supervision to Support Reflective Practices,” J. Educ. Superv., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.31045/jes.6.1.1.
B. B. Wiyono, S. P. Widayati, A. Imron, A. L. Bustami, and U. Dayati, “Implementation of Group and Individual Supervision Techniques, and Its Effect on the Work Motivation and Performance of Teachers at School Organization,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. July, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943838.
P. Dawson et al., “What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2019, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877.
Y. Kim and R. E. Silver, “Provoking Reflective Thinking in Post Observation Conversations,” J. Teach. Educ., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 203–219, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0022487116637120.
E. Gheith and N. Aljaberi, “Reflective Teaching Practices in Teachers and Their Attitudes Toward Professional Self-development,” Int. J. Progress. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 161–180, 2018, doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.146.11.
R. vanOostveen, F. Desjardins, and S. Bullock, “Professional development learning environments (PDLEs) embedded in a collaborative online learning environment (COLE): Moving towards a new conception of online professional learning,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1863–1900, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9686-6.
James H. Stronge, “Qualities of effective teachers - James H,” J. Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 348 pages, 2018.
J. Biggs and C. Tang, “Assessing for learning quality,” Teach. Qual. Learn. Univ., pp. 165–203, 2011.
M. S. Feser, I. Haak, and T. Rabe, “VeSP-Be – Vergleich von Studieneingangsphasen in Physik hinsichtlich des Sense of Belonging von Studierenden. Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente und deren deskriptive, quantitative Ergebnisse,” vol. 7, 2023, doi: 10.25656/01.
E. Lawrence, M. W. Dunn, and S. Weisfeld-Spolter, “Developing leadership potential in graduate students with assessment, self-awareness, reflection and coaching,” J. Manag. Dev., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 634–651, 2018, doi: 10.1108/JMD-11-2017-0390.
M. Wighus and I. T. Bjørk, “An educational intervention to enhance clinical skills learning: Experiences of nursing students and teachers,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 29, pp. 143–149, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.01.004.
V. C. Ngwenya, “School-based supervision enhances the professional development of teachers,” South African J. Educ., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.15700/saje.v40n3a1744.
B. B. Wiyono, A. Rasyad, and Maisyaroh, “The Effect of Collaborative Supervision Approaches and Collegial Supervision Techniques on Teacher Intensity Using Performance-Based Learning,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211013779.
J. Gore, A. Lloyd, M. Smith, J. Bowe, H. Ellis, and D. Lubans, “Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 68, pp. 99–113, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.007.
S. Norawati, A. Lutfi, Z. Zulher, and Z. Basem, “The Effect of Supervision, Work Motivation, and Interpersonal Communication on Employee Performance and Organizational Commitment as Variables Intervening,” IJEBD (International J. Entrep. Bus. Dev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 92–104, 2022, doi: 10.29138/ijebd.v5i1.1602.
D. Frost, “From professional development to system change: Teacher leadership and innovation,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 205–227, 2012, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2012.657861.
T. Strieker, M. Adams, N. Cone, D. Hubbard, and W. Lim, “Supervision matters: Collegial, developmental and reflective approaches to supervision of teacher candidates,” Cogent Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1251075.
N. Yurtseven and S. Altun, “Öğretmenlerin Program Odaklı Profesyonel Gelişiminde Öz-Değerlendirme Ve Akran Değerlendirmenin Rolü,” Hacettepe Egit. Derg., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 207–228, 2018, doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2017030461.
W. Admiraal, W. Schenke, L. De Jong, Y. Emmelot, and H. Sligte, “Schools as professional learning communities: what can schools do to support professional development of their teachers?,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 684–698, 2021, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nur Faizah, Sutiah Sutiah, Moh Muksit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
