MINERALOGICAL AND PETROGRAPHIC COMPOSITION OF ORE-BEARING ROCKS IN THE CHOLCHARATOV PROSPECTIVE AREA AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE IN THE LOCALIZATION OF MINERALIZATION (SOUTH BUKANTOV)
Downloads
Objective: This study investigates the mineralogical and petrographic composition of ore-bearing rocks in the Cholcharatov prospective area (South Bukantov) to elucidate their role in the localization and formation of mineralization. Method: Comprehensive mineralogical and petrographic analyses were conducted on ore-bearing rocks, with a focus on identifying the composition, structure, and mineral associations within the region. Particular attention was given to carbon-containing shales and their interactions with adjacent lithological units, such as quartzites. Results: The primary ore-bearing rocks in the Cholcharatov area were identified as carbon-containing shales, hosting significant sulfide mineralization. The mineralization predominantly occurs within the carbonaceous shales and is intensified in zones of contact with quartzites. These findings highlight the critical role of lithological and structural controls in localizing ore deposits. Novelty: This study provides new insights into the mineralogical and petrographic characteristics of the Cholcharatov area, emphasizing the significance of carbonaceous shales in hosting sulfide mineralization. The research contributes to the broader understanding of ore deposit formation mechanisms and offers a refined model for targeting mineralization in similar geological settings.
T. Mustafa, T. Mirza, dan S. Kalaitzidis, “Genesis of Sulfide Mineralization in the Gallala Area Kurdistan Region, Iraq: Constraints from Major and Trace Elements of Sulfide Ore Mineralization and their Host Rocks,” Iraqi Geol. J., vol. 56, no. 2F, hlm. 1–22, Des 2023, doi: 10.46717/igj.56.2f.1ms-2023-12-7.
L. Yan, N. Fengjun, S. Xiang, S. Peng, Z. Xiaoyong, dan Y. Zhaobin, “Geochemical Characteristics and Tectonic Setting of the Ore-bearing Granite Conglomerate of the Western Qinglong Uranium Ore Field in the Shigaizi Region and its Relationship with Uranium Mineralization,” Geol. Ore Depos., vol. 64, no. 3, hlm. 144–161, Jun 2022, doi: 10.1134/s1075701522030084.
P. Zhang, “A review of gold exploration in the Tulasi Area, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China,” Miner. Depos. Res. Meet. Glob. Chall., hlm. 1555–1555, 2005, doi: 10.1007/3-540-27946-6_396.
I. Yu. Melekestseva, V. V. Zaykov, P. Nimis, G. A. Tret’yakov, dan S. G. Tessalina, “Cu–(Ni–Co–Au)-bearing massive sulfide deposits associated with mafic–ultramafic rocks of the Main Urals Fault, South Urals: Geological structures, ore textural and mineralogical features, comparison with modern analogs,” Ore Geol. Rev., vol. 52, hlm. 18–36, Agu 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.03.005.
S. Yin, C. Ma, J. Xu, J. Fu, dan X.-N. Zhang, “The role of crystal mush in porphyry systems: A case study from the Baishiya ore field, East Kunlun orogenic belt, northern Qinghai-Tibet plateau,” Ore Geol. Rev., vol. 146, hlm. 104962, Jul 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.104962.
J. Ramos, “Review of: ‘Exploration of Quartz, Feldspar, and Mica Minerals Using Geophysical Resistivity, Self-Potential, and Natural Electrical Field Techniques,’” Mei 2024, doi: 10.32388/hwa8qu.
H. Gong, J. Li, D. Di, N. Li, dan Z. Zhang, “Influence of less active initiator on the living performance of atom transfer radical polymerization and the structure of the synthesized grafted copolymer,” RSC Adv., vol. 5, no. 25, hlm. 19117–19127, 2015, doi: 10.1039/c4ra15190a.
Copyright (c) 2024 O.O Kholdorov, F.S. Tilovov , N.A Berkinov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
