ASSESSMENT OF HIP JOINT ENDOPROSTHESIS TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS AND ITS IMPACT ON PATIENTS' QUALITY OF LIFE
Downloads
Objective: This study investigates the effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in restoring joint function and enhancing the overall quality of life for patients with severe hip joint disorders. Method: Conducted at the Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Surkhandarya Regional Multidisciplinary Medical Centre, Uzbekistan, the study observed 82 patients who underwent THA between 2022 and 2024. The Harris Hip Score and SF-36 health survey were used to evaluate patients’ physical function, pain levels, emotional state, and social well-being before surgery and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Findings demonstrated a significant reduction in pain and substantial improvements in mobility, independence, and physical health indicators. Patients also reported enhanced mood, sleep quality, and life satisfaction, suggesting broad psychosocial benefits beyond physical rehabilitation. Novelty: Unlike prior studies focused solely on biomechanical outcomes, this research emphasizes the holistic impact of hip endoprosthesis, highlighting THA as not merely a mechanical intervention but a transformative procedure with profound implications for psychological well-being and quality of life. The study advocates for patient-centered orthopaedic care with integrated postoperative support.
I. D. Learmonth, C. Young, and C. Rorabeck, “The operation of the century: Total hip replacement,” The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9597, pp. 1508–1519, 2007, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7.
J. R. Berstock, A. D. Beswick, E. Lenguerrand, M. R. Whitehouse, and A. W. Blom, “Mortality after total hip replacement surgery: A systematic review,” Bone & Joint Res., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 175–182, 2014, doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.36.2000254.
O. Ethgen, O. Bruyère, F. Richy, C. Dardennes, and J. Y. Reginster, “Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: A qualitative and systematic review of the literature,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 963–974, 2004, doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012.
R. Gandhi, D. Tsvetkov, J. R. Davey, and N. N. Mahomed, “Patient expectations predict greater pain relief with joint arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 716–721, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.027.
J. Dawson, R. Fitzpatrick, A. Carr, and D. Murray, “Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 1996, doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.78B2.0780185.
N. D. Clement et al., “What is the minimum clinically important difference for the Oxford Hip Score and Harris Hip Score in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty?,” Bone Joint J., vol. 103-B, no. 4, pp. 655–662, 2021, doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1452.R1.
C. A. Jones, D. C. Voaklander, D. W. Johnston, and M. E. Suarez-Almazor, “Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community-based population,” J. Rheumatol., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1745–1752, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10914853/
J. A. Singh, S. Yu, L. Chen, and J. D. Cleveland, “Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: Future projections to 2020–2040 using the National Inpatient Sample,” J. Rheumatol., vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1134–1140, 2019, doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170990.
N. D. Clement et al., “What is the minimum clinically important difference for the Oxford Hip Score and Harris Hip Score in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty?,” Bone Joint J., vol. 103-B, no. 4, pp. 655–662, 2021, doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1452.R1.
L. Okafor and A. F. Chen, “Patient satisfaction and total hip arthroplasty: A review,” Arthroplasty, vol. 1, no. 6, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s42836-019-0007-3.
M. Soleimani et al., “Return to work following primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J. Orthop. Surg. Res., vol. 18, Article 95, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03578-y.
L. K. Smith, F. Cramp, S. Palmer, N. Coghill, and R. F. Spencer, “Empirical support for radiographic review: A follow-up study of total hip arthroplasty,” Hip Int., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 2013, doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9912.
G. Hartofilakidis, T. Karachalios, G. Georgiades, and G. Kourlaba, “Total hip arthroplasty in patients with high dislocation: A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of previous reports,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., vol. 93, no. 17, pp. 1614–1618, 2011, doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00875.
D. Ponnamaneni, R. Mangal, M. Gould, T. Stead, and L. Ganti, “Factors influencing patient satisfaction with total joint replacement surgery,” Orthop. Rev., vol. 16, 2024, doi: 10.52965/001c.92646.
B. Boyer, R. Philippot, J. Geringer, and F. Farizon, “Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: A 22-year follow-up of 240 hips,” Int. Orthop., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 511–518, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1289-4.
T. Danesh-Clough, R. B. Bourne, C. H. Rorabeck, and R. McCalden, “The mid-term results of a dual offset uncemented stem for total hip arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 195–203, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.006.
Copyright (c) 2025 Joynarov Y.U., Ishburiev N.R, Shermatov U.M, Abulfayzov Z.Sh, Djuraev M.O
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
