OPTIMIZING SCIENCE LEARNING MOTIVATION THROUGH STRUCTURED AND AESTHETIC RECORDING STRATEGIES: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 PURWAKARTA
Downloads
Objective: This qualitative descriptive study aims to describe the process and impact of implementing a structured and aesthetic note-taking strategy to optimize students' motivation to learn science. Learning motivation is a crucial factor that often declines due to monotonous learning methods. Method: This study focuses on the experiences of eighth-grade students at SMPN 1 Purwakarta in adopting more organized and visually appealing note-taking habits. Data collection was conducted through three methods: participatory classroom observation, document analysis of student notebooks, and in-depth interviews with 15 students selected through purposive sampling. The collected data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive analysis model, which includes data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Results: The results show that students who implemented a structured and aesthetic note-taking strategy demonstrated positive changes in learning behavior. They became more active in processing information, rather than simply copying. Analysis of the notes revealed the use of information hierarchies, color coding, and simple diagrams that helped clarify complex science concepts. Interviews revealed that this strategy increased student interest because the note-taking process became more creative and personal. Students feel more confident and motivated to revisit their notes, which ultimately increases their persistence and engagement in science learning. Novelty: This study highlights the potential of structured and aesthetically enhanced note-taking strategies in improving student motivation and engagement in science, offering a creative and personalized approach to traditional note-taking methods.
I. N. Alifah, A. D. Permatasari, I. K. Mahardika, and Suratno, “Konstruksi Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam dalam Pendidikan: Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 2876–2884, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/23806
R. Wulandari, “Berpikir Ilmiah Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains,” Sci. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sej.umsida.ac.id/index.php/sej/article/view/1579
Prabowo, “Pembelajaran IPA untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. Pembelajaran Sains, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 75–82, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jpsi/article/view/651
M. F. Irawan and S. Bella, “Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Esensialisme dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Kelas IV di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah,” Ideguru J. Karya Ilm. Guru, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://jiwpp.unram.ac.id/index.php/primera/article/view/269
D. Safitri and R. Hidayat, “Literasi Sains untuk Membangun Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.jurnal.unma.ac.id/index.php/CP/article/view/1565
Z. Fitria, F. Arianto, and A. Sumarno, “Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. Stud. Guru dan Pembelajaran, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 693–703, 2024, doi: 10.30743/best.v3i1.2435.
A. M. Sardiman, Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
S. R. Putra, Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Yogyakarta: Diva Press, 2017.
N. Rahma and R. Susanti, “Merekam Pengalaman Proses Kreatif dan Referensinya dalam Jurnal Visual,” 2022.
I. Sari and F. Prasetyo, “Penerapan Model Six Thinking Hats untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa,” J. Interv. Psikol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uii.ac.id/intervensipsikologi/article/view/35161
H. B. Uno, Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya: Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2017.
T. Buzan, Buku Pintar Mind Map. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2013.
J. M. Clark and A. Paivio, “Dual Coding Theory and Education,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 149–210, 1991, doi: 10.1007/BF01320076.
M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, 2014.
S. B. Djamarah, Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2011.
Copyright (c) 2025 Zubaidah Christiana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














