Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Bioethics addresses complex moral conundrums in medicine, health, and human rights that usually run counter to national and religious values. Specific Background: These tensions are especially evident in bioethical concerns such as genetic engineering, reproductive technologies, and euthanasia since societal perspectives are influenced by long-standing cultural, religious, and social norms. Knowledge Gap: While bioethics has been extensively studied globally, less research has been done to look at how national values in particular influence bioethical decision-making, especially in specific culture contexts like Uzbek thought. This study aims to investigate the relationship between national values and bioethics, with a focus on the influence of Uzbekistan's religious and cultural beliefs. Results: The results demonstrate that bioethical quandaries arise when modern medical technology do not align with the moral, legal, and spiritual frameworks of traditional Uzbek society. Important factors to take into account include the impact of family traditions, the need of maintaining moral standards in society, and religious opposition to organ donation and euthanasia. Novelty: This study clarifies how national values impact public opinions of bioethics, particularly in cultures that prioritize community values above individual ones, by presenting the Uzbek perspective in a fresh manner. Implications: Understanding these intersections enables healthcare practitioners and governments to make bioethical decisions that uphold human rights and national values in culturally sensitive countries.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- Т Olanov J. Philosophy of values. - Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 2008, 23 p.
- Al-Aqeel AI. Ethical guidelines in genetics and genomics. An Islamic perspective. Saudi Med J. 2005 Dec;26(12):1862-70. PMID: 16380763.
- Instruction dignitas personae On certain bioethical questions// https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20081208_dignitas-personae_en.html
- Philip Brey (University of Twente) (lead author). International differences in ethical standards and in the interpretation of legal frameworks SATORI Deliverable D3.2// https://satoriproject.eu/media/D3.2-Int-differences-in-ethical-standards.pdf
- Wolinsky H. Bioethics for the world. EMBO Rep. 2006 Apr;7(4):354-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400670. PMID: 16585934; PMCID: PMC1456905.
- Bulger RE, Meyer Bobby E, Fineberg HV, editors Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Social and Ethical Impacts of Developments in Biomedicine. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1995.
- Mukhamedova Z. M., Cattarova D. G., Khudaibergenova P. T. Role of humanistic and medical education and professionalization of doctors //Humanitarian tract. - 2019. - No. 52. - S. 19-23.
- J. A. Rizaev, Z M. Muhamedova. Social responsibility and health // Academic research in educational sciences. 2022. №2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnaya-otvetstvennost-i-zdorovie
- Norkulov S. D., Atamuratova F. S. Sociocultural Phenomenon of Biomedical Ethics //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2022. – №. 1. – P. 78-81.
- Atamuratova F. S., Otamurodov S. S. Development of global bioethics education //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2022. – №. 2. – P. 78-82.
References
Т Olanov J. Philosophy of values. - Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 2008, 23 p.
Al-Aqeel AI. Ethical guidelines in genetics and genomics. An Islamic perspective. Saudi Med J. 2005 Dec;26(12):1862-70. PMID: 16380763.
Instruction dignitas personae On certain bioethical questions// https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20081208_dignitas-personae_en.html
Philip Brey (University of Twente) (lead author). International differences in ethical standards and in the interpretation of legal frameworks SATORI Deliverable D3.2// https://satoriproject.eu/media/D3.2-Int-differences-in-ethical-standards.pdf
Wolinsky H. Bioethics for the world. EMBO Rep. 2006 Apr;7(4):354-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400670. PMID: 16585934; PMCID: PMC1456905.
Bulger RE, Meyer Bobby E, Fineberg HV, editors Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Social and Ethical Impacts of Developments in Biomedicine. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1995.
Mukhamedova Z. M., Cattarova D. G., Khudaibergenova P. T. Role of humanistic and medical education and professionalization of doctors //Humanitarian tract. - 2019. - No. 52. - S. 19-23.
J. A. Rizaev, Z M. Muhamedova. Social responsibility and health // Academic research in educational sciences. 2022. №2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnaya-otvetstvennost-i-zdorovie
Norkulov S. D., Atamuratova F. S. Sociocultural Phenomenon of Biomedical Ethics //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2022. – №. 1. – P. 78-81.
Atamuratova F. S., Otamurodov S. S. Development of global bioethics education //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2022. – №. 2. – P. 78-82.