THE INFLUENCE OF ACTIVE LEARNING MODELS ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PGSD STUDENTS IN SEMESTER 2
Downloads
Objective: This study aims to explore the impact of active learning models on student learning outcomes in the PGSD Study Program in semester 2 using a qualitative approach. Method: The method chosen was a qualitative survey through an open-ended questionnaire, combined with a phenomenological approach to deeply understand students' personal experiences of active learning. A total of 79 respondents participated in this study. Data were analyzed by thematic analysis to find meaning and patterns in the learning experience. Result: The results showed that the active learning model had a positive impact on increasing students' participation, understanding of the material, and sense of responsibility for learning. Students feel more cognitively and affectively fulfilled, and can connect learning with real-world experiences. Novelty: The findings confirm the importance of andragogy principles in higher education, where students as adult learners benefit more from participatory and reflective learning processes.
R. Kasi, “Pembelajaran aktif: Mendorong partisipasi siswa,” OSF Prepr., 2022.
I. Kristiyani, E., & Budiningsih, “Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran e‑learning dan minat belajar terhadap hasil belajar akuntansi.,” J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 81–100, 2019.
E. Kristiyani and I. Budiningsih, “The Effect Of E-Learning Learning Strategy And Study Interest On Accounting Learning Outcomes,” Akademika, vol. 8, no. 01, pp. 57–69, 2019.
Latifah et. al., “Optimalisasi kemampuan berpikir kritis melalui metode flipped classroom: Systematic literature review,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 8174–8184, 2024.
M. T. Armiati, & Hidayat, “Podcast Spotify sebagai media pembelajaran audio untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 116–126, 2024.
Freeman, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 23, no. 111, pp. 8410–8415, 2014.
J. S. Jeong, D. González-Gómez, F. Cañada-Cañada, A. Gallego-Picó, and J. C. Bravo, “Effects of active learning methodologies on the students’ emotions, self-efficacy beliefs and learning outcomes in a science distance learning course,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 217–227, 2023, doi: 10.3926/jotse.530.
R. S. Anam, S. Gumilar, I. N. Ainie, and F. A. Wibowo, “Tren dan Tantangan Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Pendidikan: Analisis Artikel pada Jurnal Terakreditasi Nasional,” Kalam Cendekia J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 13, pp. 1–23, 2023.
J. R. Drake and others, “A critical analysis of active learning and an alternative pedagogical framework for introductory information systems courses,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2012.
J. A. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE‑ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington DC: George Washington University, 1991.
L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John‑Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.) (A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas, & M. Cole [with J. V. Wertsch], Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard university press, 1978.
Y. Tamrin, M., Sirate, S. F., “Teori belajar konstruktivisme Vygotsky dalam pembelajaran matematika. Sigma (Suara Intelektual Gaya Matematika),” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2011.
M. S. Knowles, The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, 1984.
R. Purnami, “Implementasi metode experiential learning dalam pengembangan softskills mahasiswa yang menunjang integrasi teknologi, manajemen, dan bisnis.,” J. Penelit. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 13, 2016.
Q. Hao, B. Barnes, E. Wright, and E. Kim, “Effects of active learning environments and instructional methods in computer science education,” SIGCSE 2018 - Proc. 49th ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 2018-January, pp. 934–939, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3159450.3159451.
S. Hartikainen, H. Rintala, L. Pylväs, and P. Nokelainen, “The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 9–12, 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9040276.
Copyright (c) 2025 Andi Mardiana Paduppai, Marsheyla Resty Fitrawantono, Nur Widiya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
